## Summary Removes the compensating-controls (CC) framework. Prowler and Kingfisher continue to run weekly and produce reports; the Prowler mutelist YAML files stay in place but no longer carry \`CC: <id>\` prefixes — each entry now just keeps a free-form \`Description\` of why it's muted. The CC review cadence proved to be more process overhead than this single-operator homelab needed. ## What changed **Deleted** - \`compensating-controls.yaml\` — the CC registry - \`mise-tasks/review-compensating-controls\` — the staleness-review task - \`docs/how-to/operations/review-compensating-controls.md\` - \`docs/how-to/operations/record-review-evidence.md\` (was aspirational) - \`docs/explanation/compliance-mute-categories.md\` (proposed-future CC/NA/RA work) - 5 orphan \`+review-cc-*\` / \`+compliance-mute-categories\` changelog fragments **Modified** - 6 mutelist YAML files: stripped \`CC: <id>.\` prefix from every \`Description\` / \`statement\` field, kept the free-form text - \`mise-tasks/review-compliance-reports\`: removed CC mentions from docstrings, panel text, and the node-verification table title. Node-verification logic itself is unchanged. - \`docs/reference/operations/security.md\`: removed the "Compensating controls" section - \`docs/how-to/operations/read-compliance-reports.md\`: rewrote step 3 of "Acting on findings" to point at the mutelist YAML directly - \`docs/changelog.d/prowler-iac-mutelist.infra.md\`: rewrote to drop the "two new compensating controls" framing ## What did not change - All Prowler manifests (cronjobs, RBAC, PVs, kustomization) — scans still run on the same schedule - The Kingfisher deployment - The trivy-shim in the Prowler container — that's about Trivy ignorefile plumbing, independent of the CC concept - The mutelist entries themselves — each \`Resources\` list is unchanged; only the prose of \`Description\` was edited - \`CHANGELOG.md\` — historical releases are left as-is ## Test plan - [ ] Wait for human review before deploying — once merged, re-point ArgoCD: \`argocd app set prowler --revision main && argocd app sync prowler\` (no manifest changes besides the ConfigMap, so impact is limited to muted-finding descriptions in next week's report) - [ ] Confirm next weekly Prowler K8s CIS run (Sunday 3am) still completes and produces a report on sifaka - [ ] Confirm next weekly Prowler IaC run still honors \`trivyignore.yaml\` (the trivy shim is untouched but the ignorefile content was rewritten) - [ ] \`mise run review-compliance-reports\` — verify node-verification block still runs and prints the renamed table title Reviewed-on: #359
90 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
90 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: Read Compliance Reports
|
|
modified: 2026-04-06
|
|
last-reviewed: 2026-04-06
|
|
tags:
|
|
- how-to
|
|
- security
|
|
- compliance
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Read Compliance Reports
|
|
|
|
How to access and interpret compliance scan reports from [[prowler]] and other security scanners.
|
|
|
|
## Quick summary
|
|
|
|
```fish
|
|
mise run review-compliance-reports
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This fetches the latest Prowler report from sifaka, parses it (respecting muted status), compares against the previous week, and shows only actionable unmuted failures. Use `--show-muted` to also see muted findings, or `--full` for complete detail.
|
|
|
|
## Accessing reports
|
|
|
|
Reports are stored on sifaka at `/volume1/reports/`. Each scanner writes to its own subdirectory:
|
|
|
|
| Scanner | Path | Schedule |
|
|
|---------|------|----------|
|
|
| [[prowler]] K8s CIS | `sifaka:/volume1/reports/prowler/` | Weekly (Sunday 3am) |
|
|
| [[prowler]] Image | `sifaka:/volume1/reports/prowler-images/` | Weekly (Saturday 3am) |
|
|
| [[prowler]] IaC | `sifaka:/volume1/reports/prowler-iac/` | Weekly (Saturday 2am) |
|
|
|
|
Copy reports to your local machine (remember `scp -O` for sifaka):
|
|
|
|
```fish
|
|
scp -O sifaka:/volume1/reports/prowler/prowler-output-In-Cluster-*.html /tmp/
|
|
open /tmp/prowler-output-In-Cluster-*.html
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Report formats
|
|
|
|
### HTML
|
|
|
|
Open in a browser. Self-contained, filterable by severity, status, and service. Best for human review — shows pass/fail per check with remediation guidance.
|
|
|
|
### CSV
|
|
|
|
One row per finding. Columns include check ID, status, severity, resource, namespace, description, and remediation. Good for filtering in a spreadsheet or scripting.
|
|
|
|
### JSON-OCSF
|
|
|
|
Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework format. Machine-parseable, suitable for SIEM ingestion or programmatic analysis.
|
|
|
|
### Compliance CSV
|
|
|
|
In the `compliance/` subdirectory. Findings mapped to specific framework requirement IDs (e.g., CIS 1.11 section numbers). Shows which controls pass or fail.
|
|
|
|
## Interpreting results
|
|
|
|
### Status values
|
|
|
|
- **PASS** — the resource is configured securely per the check
|
|
- **FAIL** — remediation is recommended
|
|
- **MANUAL** — Prowler cannot determine the result automatically (e.g., kubelet file permissions when not running on the node)
|
|
- **MUTED** — the finding was explicitly suppressed via a mutelist
|
|
|
|
### Severity
|
|
|
|
Findings are categorized as **critical**, **high**, **medium**, or **low**. Focus on critical and high first.
|
|
|
|
### Expected failures
|
|
|
|
Not all failures require action. Common expected failures in our minikube cluster:
|
|
|
|
- **Core/pod security (high):** System pods (ArgoCD, external-secrets, tailscale-operator) legitimately need elevated privileges. These can be mutelisted.
|
|
- **Apiserver (medium):** Audit logging, profiling, and some admission plugins are not configured in minikube defaults. Low risk for a homelab.
|
|
- **Kubelet (high):** Anonymous auth or read-only port settings from minikube defaults.
|
|
|
|
### Acting on findings
|
|
|
|
1. **Triage** — review new failures, distinguish real issues from expected noise
|
|
2. **Remediate** — fix what you can (pod security contexts, RBAC tightening)
|
|
3. **Mutelist** — suppress expected/accepted failures by adding a Resource entry under the matching Check in `argocd/manifests/prowler/mutelist/*.yaml` with a free-form `Description` explaining why
|
|
4. **Track** — compare reports over time to spot regressions
|
|
|
|
## Related
|
|
|
|
- [[security]] — security & compliance posture overview
|
|
- [[deploy-prowler]] — Prowler deployment and ad-hoc scans
|
|
- [[kingfisher]] — secret detection scanner
|